Forecasting the Oscars ® since 2003

"It's not about who we want to win,

It's about who will"

HOME
Agenda
Chart
Forums
Precursors
Reviews
Specials
BLOG TALK
PREDICTIONS 2007

FILM REVIEWS (2007 RELEASES)

Picture
Director
Actor
 

"SPIDER-MAN 3" (PG-13)

"Spider-Man 3" is undoubtedly, the worst in the franchise...

By Tom Houseman

In the first Spiderman, the phrase “with great power comes great responsibility” is repeated ad nauseam. You might remember that line if you saw the movie and have ears. Well, director Sam Raimi has the power, and he is using it to destroy Spiderman. Raimi’s $250 dollar abomination is an insult to Spiderman, and all arachnids, as well as being further proof of Raimi’s intent to turn everyone’s favorite web slinger into an emo teenage boy. There have been plenty of awful superhero movies lately (Hulk and Superman Returns come to mind), but Spiderman 3 may be the worst.

The first two Spiderman films were melodramatic messes, but Raimi was able to overcome their absurdity with explosive action sequences and enough fun to make the experiences worthwhile. But in Part 3, the film is drowned in an ocean of drama, and the escape boats given to the audience are all broken. Spiderman 3 features three new villains: Sandman (Thomas Hayden Church), Venom (Topher Grace), and Hobgoblin, aka Harry Osborne (James Franco). On top of that, there is the resurgence of the nauseating Peter, Harry, Mary Jane love triangle. The situation might be passable if any of the three lead knew how to act, but that is not the case. Tobey Maguire can play nerdy to perfection, and Kirsten Dunst’s portrayal of an untalented actress is spot on, but any actual acting they do is lost in the pit where their talent is supposed to be. James Franco comes closest to giving a decent performance, but Harry Osborne is such a poorly developed character that Franco isn’t allowed to do more than brood and yell.

Sadly, not even the action sequences are up to par. The first encounter between Spidey and Harry Osborne as Hobgoblin is shot so poorly that it is difficult to watch without getting dizzy. Even the better fight scenes between Spiderman and the Sandman are unable to capture the magic of Spidey’s best bouts with Doc Octopus, although the effects for Sandman are impressive. And then there is the serious disservice to Venom, one of the best villains ever. In the film, Venom is a space parasite who attacks Spiderman, makes him even more angsty (if that’s possible), and causes him to spurn Mary Jane for Gwen Stacy (dear God, Bryce Dallas Howard, you are a good actress! Stop making only awful movies!) We only see Venom as a super villain near the end of the movie, which is far less than this terrifying creature deserves.

In addition to the visual extravaganza that is only missing the kitchen sink, Raimi throws in some comedy in an attempt to make the experience more bearable, but the result is, unfortunately, the exact opposite. There are several sequences in which we see Venom’s affect on Parker, including a prolonged dreadful dance sequence involving him and Gwen Stacy. Newspaper man J. Jonah Jameson (J.K. Simmons) has his traditional wacky antics, but these ridiculous, campy scenes, when combined with the painful melodrama, make Spiderman 3 even worse. The only highpoints in the movie a cameo by Bruce Campbell as a French waiter, and a hilarious one-line appearance by Stan Lee, but these diamonds in the rough do not come close to compensating for the abysmal 140 minutes of Spiderman 3. Sadly, it seems as if the onslaught of new Spiderman films will never cease, but maybe Sam Raimi, in a delightfully ironic twist, will be crushed by a meteor carrying an evil parasite, and will be replaced by a competent director who can make Spiderman the movie he deserves.

**/****

 
Actress
Supporting Actor
Supp. Actress
Screenplays
Artistic / Techs
Golden Globes

FEATURES

Archive
Chart
Precursors

COMMUNITY

About Us
Bait an Oscar
Forums
Links

REVIEWS

Index